Coalition (HIC) has consistently called for the integrity of the Habitat II
(Istanbul, 1996) commitments and modalities, especially as the world advances
toward Habitat III (the United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban
• Upholding the
Habitat II-established principle to be as inclusive as possible;
• Maintaining the Habitat Agenda,
not pursuing a narrower “urban agenda”;
• Ensuring that human rights
governance approaches continue to anchor and guide global human
settlement policy and corresponding commitments.
The various Habitat
III preparations, reporting and deliberation processes and contents officially
have avoided (1) a faithful evaluation of commitments made at Habitat II; (2) a
review of housing rights and good-governance practices consistent with those
essential aspects of the Habitat II promise, while taking into consideration
the lessons learned and conceptual clarity gained since Habitat II; and (3)
realistic preparation for the emerging human settlement-development challenges
that light the way toward improving “balanced rural and urban development,” as
pledged since Habitat I (Vancouver, 1976).
campaign, or periodic report of UN-Habitat or the United Nations (UN) Secretary
General so far has reviewed or evaluated the commitments of Habitat II, and the
UN-Habitat-proffered national Habitat III reporting guidelines deliberately
omitted these essentials. By design, the Habitat III process has missed the
opportunity to assess the Habitat Agenda’s strengths and weaknesses, or
consider the relevant norms that have developed over the past 20 years.
Instead, a willful amnesia about the holistic Habitat Agenda and an
exclusively “urban” focus have prevailed, dividing and alienating
constituencies, while culling them in favor of a narrower set of interests. The
spirit of Vancouver and the achievements of Istanbul are now at stake.
Click here to download the full document.